Ram and Ors. v. Saflu and Ros
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal from 1990 dismissed for want of prosecution as appellant's counsel had no instructions; any interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 476 of 1990
Appellant :- Ram And Ors Respondent :- Saflu And Ros Counsel for Appellant :- A.S. Chaudhary,R.K. Chaudhary
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Shri P.V. Chaudhary, Advocate holding brief of Shri R.V. Chaudhary, learned counsel for the appellant which is printed as R.K. Chaudhary submits that despite information to the respondent none has contacted, therefore he has no instructions to appear and argue.
In view of above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 17.9.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram And Ors
- respondent
Saflu And Ros
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/476/1990
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Manjeet Singh vs Mr. Ashutosh Mohan Agnihotri, Addl. Dir. Rajya Krishi Utapadan Mandi Parishad, U.P. Lko.and Another
Ram Janak and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Revenue Deptt., Lucknow and Others
Ishanavi Singh Thru. Biological Father Amit Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others
Om Prakash Verma vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others