Application for amendment in the index and memo of appeal in a second appeal, sought due to typographical error. With no objection from the other side, the court allowed the amendment to be incorporated within two weeks.
Amendment to index and memo of appeal permitted; to be incorporated within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 134 of 2024
Appellant :- Renu Tripathi And Another Respondent :- Sri. Subedar Shatrohan Maurya And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Madhur Kant Srivastava,Neeti Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Madan Gopal Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
I.A. 2 of 2024
Heard Smt. Neeti Singh, learned counsel for the appellants and Ms. Kirti Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Madan Gopal Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
This is an application for amendment in the index as well as in the memo of appeal.
There is no objection by the other side.
The amendment sought are formal in nature and the same are due to typographical error.
The application is allowed.
Le the amendment be incorporated within two weeks.
List thereafter.
Order Date :- 23.10.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Renu Tripathi
Sri. Subedar Shatrohan Maurya
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
