Disposed
Aditya Krishna v. Smt. Tangam Acharya Handoo and 2 Others
Allahabad HCSAPL/161/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Procedural listing order only; decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
AI extract
Procedural listing order only; decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 161 of 2024
Appellant :- Aditya Krishna Respondent :- Smt. Tangam Acharya Handoo And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Kaustubh Singh,Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Jag Prasad Yadav
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the description of parties in this appeal is not correct at certain place, therefore, he has to move an application for amendment.
List after two weeks showing the name of Shri Awadhesh Kumar Yadav as counsel for the respondents.
Order Date :- 11.9.2024 Raj
Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Aditya Krishna
Smt. Tangam Acharya Handoo
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court