Rajesh Kumar Prabhakar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused person in a charge-sheets based on extortion allegations at a border crossing.
This judgment rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by an accused person in a charge-sheets based on extortion allegations at a border crossing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:158448
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9226 of 2024
Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Prabhakar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar,Vikrant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
"It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to enlarge the Applicant on bail in anticipation in Case Crime No. 0211 of 2024 (State vs. Constable Hardayal and others) Under Section 111, 309(4), 310(2), 61(2), 318 of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and 7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station Narhi, District Ballia."
and were directed to go at the said place in the night. It was further informed that ADG, Zone, Varanasi along with his team will also go there and a surprise checking will be done at about 01:00 a.m. at Bharoli Tiraha, District Ballia. All the teams were constituted under the supervision of DIG Sri Vaibhav Krishna. The teams went at the said place after which ADG, Varanasi and other members of team reached there. The teams took their positions at the strategic places and apprehended the police personnels and other persons. A recovery memo was thus prepared on the basis of which a First Information Report has been lodged.
submitted that in the present matter 18 persons have been arrested at the spot. It is submitted that the applicant is also involved in the present matter and hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail be rejected.
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Order Date :- 24.9.2024 Naresh
Digitally signed by :- NARESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a case alleging extortion of money from heavy vehicles at a border crossing.
Whether the allegations against the applicant are false and imaginary given the circumstances of the raid.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Rajesh Kumar Prabhakar
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court