Abdul Kadir Alias Kadir v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected an application under Section 482 BNSS seeking anticipatory bail. The application was based on an allegation of false implication, but the court declined bail due to the heinous nature of the offence and concerns regarding evidence tampering and fleeing.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; application stands dismissed.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:190258
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 11478 of 2024
Applicant :- Abdul Kadir Alias Kadir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Saroj
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for applicant and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 399 of 2024, under Sections 318(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 317(5), 111, 336(1) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanghita, Police Station- Kotwali, DistrictMuzaffarnagar.
Learned counsel for accused-applicant argued that the accusedapplicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number. The accused-applicant has criminal antecedent of one case in which the applicant has been acquitted by the learned trial court vide order dated 07.10.2024.The applicant use to do work of providing loan to people for purchasing vehicle. The applicant is not named in the FIR. His name disclosed in the statement of one of the arrested accused, namely, Gulbahar. There is no independent witness of the said incident. He further submits that there is no likelihood of fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in a case involving engine and chassis number manipulation and vehicle financing fraud.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Abdul Kadir Alias Kadir
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ashutosh Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/11478/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page
- Order 2 · Ashutosh Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court