Anticipatory bail in a BNS case was not pressed on merits; counsel sought a direction for expeditious disposal of regular bail. Court refused anticipatory bail, granted two weeks' protection from coercive action, and directed expeditious bail decision per Satender Kumar Antil.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:174573
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10835 of 2024
Applicant :- Monu Saroj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Om Prakash Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 7.11.2024/SKD
Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Monu Saroj
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
