Disposed

Talib v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC12 Nov 2024NABAIL/10603/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant withdrew the prayer for anticipatory bail on merit and sought an direction for expeditious decision of regular bail by the trial court. The court refused the anticipatory bail but directed the lower court to decide the bail application expeditiously upon surrender, while prohibiting coercive action for two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of; direction for expeditious bail hearing by lower court; stay on coercive action for two weeks.

Talib Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:177952

¶2

Court No. - 70

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10603 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Talib Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Chauhan,Rahul Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 409 of 2024, under Sections 309 (4) BNS 2023 (Old Section 394 I.P.C.), Police Station- Pilkhuwa, DistrictHapur, during the pendency of trial.

¶8

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant.

¶10

Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that if applicant surrender before the concerned Court below within two weeks from today and applies for regular bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another , reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922.

¶12

For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.

¶14

Order Date :- 13.11.2024/Aditya

¶15

Digitally signed by :- ADITYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Talib v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Talib v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases