First Appeal No. 89 of 2019 filed by Akanksha Antaj. The appellant failed to appear to press the appeal. The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 89 of 2019
Appellant :- Akanksha Antaj Respondent :- Vinay Kumar Rao Counsel for Appellant :- Raghvendra Pandey,Anurag Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Deo Raj,Jai Ram
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
List is being revised.
None responds on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal.
The present appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution . Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 4.12.2024 Ajit
Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Akanksha Antaj
Vinay Kumar Rao
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
