Smt. Ragini Srivastava v. Vinay Kumar Srivastava
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence despite copy of the notice being sent to the Advocate-General.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence despite copy of the notice being sent to the Advocate-General.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:80372-DB
Court No. - 10
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 29 of 2019
Appellant :- Smt. Ragini Srivastava Respondent :- Vinay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Appellant :- Rudranshu Kumar,Anil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- S.K.Tripathi
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
[Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.]
Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Piyush/-
Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Ragini Srivastava
Vinay Kumar Srivastava
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court