An appeal was dismissed due to the appellant's failure to facilitate service of notices on respondents, per office report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79441-DB
Court No. - 10
Case :- FIRST APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 88 of 2018
Appellant :- Km. Babi Respondent :- Ram Prasad And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Sanjay Kumar Verma,Lalji Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
This appeal is listed under Chapter 12 Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952.
As per the office report dated 28.11.2024 learned Counsel for the appellant has not taken steps for service of notice upon the respondents.
Accordingly, the appeal under Chapter 12 Rule 4 is hereby dismissed .
[Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.]
Order Date :- 29.11.2024 Piyush/-
Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Km. Babi
Ram Prasad
Vivek Chaudhary
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
