L.D.A. v. Ram Krishna
Case brief
What is this about?
This order contains three cases decided on a consensus to apply the settled precedent of First Appeal No. 56 of 2006, dismissing a first appeal and allowing cross objections to fix land acquisition compensation at Rs. 3.25 per square feet.
What did the court decide?
First Appeal No. 108 of 1994 dismissed. Cross Objection No. 16 of 2015 allowed. Cross Objection No. 3 of 2021 allowed in terms of the order dated 10.10.2017.
What the court decided
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 108 of 1994
Appellant :- L.D.A. Respondent :- Ram Krishna Counsel for Appellant :- J.B.Dubey,Ajaay Kumar Singh,Ajay Kumar Singh,K.Chandra,U.Chandra,Vishva Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent :- B.K. Saxena,A.P.Singh Gaur,K.K.Saxena,Kritika Thakur,Prashant Singh Gaur,Syed Anzar Husain,Vishva Nath Singh
And
Case :- CROSS OBJECTION No. - 16 of 2015
Objector :- Lucknow Development Authority Lucknow In Fapl No.108/1994 Respondent :- Ram Krishnan And Ors. Counsel for Objector :- Jang Bahadur Dubey
And
Case :- CROSS OBJECTION No. - 3 of 2021
Objector :- Lucknow Development Authority In 107 Fapl 1994 Respondent :- Purushottam Das And Co. And Others Counsel for Objector :- B.K. Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- Syed Anzar Husain,Faisal Husain
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the benefit of higher compensation awarded in First Appeal No. 56 of 2006 applies to the pending cross objections arising from the same acquisition notification.
Whether the objection to the cross objection filed under Order 41 CPC should be allowed given the concession of applicability of the precedent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
L.D.A.
- respondent
Ram Krishna
- respondent
Purushottam Das
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAPL/108/1994
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court