First appeal from order concerning an insurance matter; service of notice was sufficient on respondent no.1 but not on respondents nos. 2 and 3. The court directed amendment of respondent no.2's address, issue of fresh notice to respondent no.3, and listing with the service report.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 65 of 2024
Appellant :- Lalit Ram Gupta And 2 Others Respondent :- The Legal Manager The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Vineet Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- Prasoon Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report, service of notice is sufficient upon respondent no.1 and not sufficient upon respondent nos. 2 and 3 as the same have returned back with the remark 'no person of such name reside at village' and 'not met' and it was informed that he went outside respectively.
In view of above, let the present correct address of the respondent no.2 be provided/amended.
Issue fresh notice to the respondent no.3.
Steps to be taken within a week.
List with service report.
Order Date :- 17.9.2024 Akanksha Sri.
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Lalit Ram Gupta And 2 Others
The Legal Manager The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Lko. And 2 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
