This is a routine procedural order listing the matter and directing the issuance of fresh notices to certain respondents due to insufficient service. It does not contain substantive legal reasoning or a final disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 5
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 39 of 2024
Appellant :- United India Insurance Company Limited Lko. Thru. Manager Respondent :- Smt. Sushila Pandey And 6 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Deepak Kumar Agarwal
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report, service of notice is sufficient upon respondent nos.2,6 and 7 whereas it is not sufficient upon respondent nos.1,3,4 and 5 as the respondent no.1 has died and respondent no.3 has married and does not live on the given address and respondent nos.4 and 5 had gone somewhere outside.
Issue fresh notice to the respondent nos.4 and 5 returnable at an early date.
Steps to be taken within a week.
As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, list after two weeks to enable him to take appropriate steps for respondent no.1 and also provide/amend the present correct address of the respondent no.3.
Order Date :- 23.5.2024 Akanksha Sri.
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
United India Insurance Company Limited
Smt. Sushila Pandey And 6 Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
