First Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel was absent and no request for adjournment was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:83797
Court No. - 17
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 571 of 2007
Appellant :- Smt.Vidya Srivastava Respondent :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Counsel for Appellant :- Singh Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Akhtar Abbas
Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
Case has been called in the revised list.
Neither the learned counsel for appellant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
Accordingly, the present F.A.F.O. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.12.2024 Satish
Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Vidya Srivastava
U.P.S.R.T.C.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
