First appeal from order dismissed for non-prosecution after appellant's counsel reported no instructions; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 441 of 2006
Appellant :- Raj Kumar Pandey Respondent :- Smt. Usha Devi And 5 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Arvind Kumar Jauhari Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Kr. Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Arvind Kumar Jauhari, learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite information, none has turned up on behalf of the appellant so he has no instructions in the matter to appear and argue.
Dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 17.9.2024 Akanksha Sri.
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raj Kumar Pandey
Smt. Usha Devi
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
