This is a one-line order noting a procedural defect in the appellant's provision which was corrected by the Court during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 398 of 2024
Appellant :- Prabhat Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Ram Ujagir Verma
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Office has reported that the learned counsel for the appellant has declined to remove the defect, however it is not disputed that there is defect in the provision.
Let it be corrected.
List with office report.
As prayed, list on 16.12.2024 as fresh.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Prabhat Agarwal
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And Others
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
