which the deceased suffered serious injuries, on account of which he died on 29.12.2016. It has been alleged by the appellants in the written statement that the F.I.R. was lodged against an unknown truck of hitting the jeep, however the accident of jeep with the motor cycle of the deceased has been admitted by the driver Shyam Bux Singh, who appeared as DW-1 in his examination in chief as well as cross-examination. The F.I.R. appears was lodged in regard to the hitting of the jeep by the unknown truck, therefore it can not be said that the jeep was not involved in the accident in question in which the deceased died. The pillion rider of the motor cycle Anil Kumar Singh appeared as PW-2 as an eye witness who proved the accident and nothing could be extracted which may create any doubt about his veracity. The accident has also been admitted by the driver, therefore the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is misconceived and not tenable. The appeal has been filed on misconceived and baseless grounds which is liable to be dismissed.
