Sunita Devi v. Vishraj and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a procedural order listing the matter and granting three weeks for respondents to file objections. It does not decide any substantive issue.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 12 of 2024
Appellant :- Sunita Devi Respondent :- Vishraj And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Prateek Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- Chandra Prakash Verma,Ram Prasad Rajput,Sunil Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Chandra Prakash Verma learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1.
Sri S.K. Shukla learned Advocate submits that he has filed power on behalf of respondent no.2.
Office to verify and print their names in the cause list as counsel for the respondents.
As per office report, service of notice is sufficient on all respondents.
As prayed by learned counsel for the respondent, three weeks' time is granted to file objection, if any.
List thereafter.
(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sunita Devi
- respondent
Vishraj And 3 Others
Coram
Rajnish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAFO/12/2024
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court