The High Court vacated a conditional order requiring a mediation deposit as the revisionist failed to pay within the stipulated time, indicating lack of interest in mediation. The case was listed after three weeks.
Order dated 06.08.2024 was vacated; case listed after three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 312 of 2024
Revisionist :- Ashutosh Mishra
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another
Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Phal,Divya Singh,Neelam Kumari
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Vakalatnama filed by Smt. Ushal Tripathi, Advocate, on behalf of respondent no.2 is taken on record.
List of personal appearance matters has been revised. None appears for the revisionist even in the revised call.
This Court vide order dated 06.08.2024 had required the revisionist to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- on the argument of learned counsel for the revisionist that there is every likelihood of the parties settling the dispute in case the matter is referred to the Mediation Center of this Court.
As per office report dated 29.08.2024, the amount of Rs.25,000/- has still not been deposited by the revisionist.
From the aforesaid, it is apparent that the revisionist is not interested in mediation as in case his intention was to go for mediation then the aforesaid amount would have been deposited.
Considering the aforesaid, the order dated 06.08.2024 even though it was a conditional order yet it is specifically vacated. It is clarified that no interim order is in existence in the revision.
In the interest of justice, list this case after three weeks indicating the name of Smt. Usha Tripathi, learned counsel, in the cause list from the side of the respondents.
Respondent no.2 need not appear again unless specifically called for.
Order Date :- 29.8.2024 A. Katiyar
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to vacate the conditional order for mediation deposit when the revisionist failed to deposit the amount.
State Of U.P.
Principal Secy. Home
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
