Adjournment order in a criminal revision granting the opposite party no.2 two weeks to file vakalatnama and objections to a delay-condonation application, with listing after two weeks. Decides nothing of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 159 of 2024
Revisionist :- Indukant Tripathi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Anand Dubey,Km. Saumya Tiwari,Ram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Shri Shesh Mani Dubey, learned Counsel has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2 and states that he has received
instructions today itself, therefore, he may be granted two weeks time to file vakalatnama and objection to the application for condonation of delay on behalf of the opposite party no.2.
As prayed, time is granted.
List after two weeks.
( Om Prakash Shukla, J.)
Order Date :- 6.8.2024 Ajit
Digitally signed by :- AJIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
State Of U.P.
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
