Criminal revision concerning a final report submitted by the Investigating Officer; the court took the IO's objections/affidavit on record, issued notice to opposite parties 2 and 3, and directed the matter to be listed fresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 546 of 2024
Revisionist :- Deepak Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Alok Kumar Mishra,Prateek Tewari,Veer Bahadur Lal Srivasta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
The objections / affidavit of the concerned Investigating Officer who has submitted the final report, filed by the learned A.G.A. is taken on record.
Issue notice to the opposite party Nos.2 & 3.
It is contended that the respondent Nos.4 & 5 are the coaccused as such, no notice needs to be issued to them as they are only formal opposite parties.
List on the date indicated in the notice, as fresh.
Order Date :- 10.7.2024 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Deepak Yadav
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko.
Abdul Moin
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
