X-Juvenile v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal revision under the POCSO Act and Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, the Court directed service of notice on opposite parties via CJM, granted time for counter-affidavits until December 3, and listed the case for further hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5353 of 2024
Revisionist :- X-Juvenile Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Amit Kumar Gaur,Shailendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
The instant matter relates to POCSO Act and Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Learned Government Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of the State of U.P./opposite party no. 1.
Let a notice be issued to opposite party Nos. 2 and 4 within five days by FAX through Chief Judicial Magistrate concerned, who will ensure service of notice upon opposite party Nos. 2 and 4 and submit report by the next date fixed in the matter.
Steps be taken within a week.
Four weeks' time is granted to the opposite parties to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed by the revisionist within two weeks thereafter.
List this case on 03.12.2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
X-Juvenile
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/5353/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Siddharth
- Order 2 · Siddharth
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court