Criminal revision against an order directing the husband to pay interim maintenance to his wife and minor son under Section 125 CrPC. The High Court found no infirmity in the Family Court's order and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36677
Court No. - 15
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 515 of 2024
Revisionist :- Ajay Singh @ Lucky Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1.Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State on this criminal revision filed against order dated 13.3.2024, passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Sitapur in Crl. Misc. Case No.1358 of 2022 Smt. Archana Devi and another versus Ajay Singh alias Lucky under section 125 CrPC, whereby the revisionist has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.3000/- per month to private respondent No.2 and Rs.2000/- per month to his son, respondent No.3 herein, from the date of the order, as interim maintenance, and perused the record.
2.Notice to respondents No.2 and 3 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order.
3.It is not in dispute that respondent No.2 is legally wedded wife of the revisionist and respondent No.3 is his son. They are living separately. Considering the fact that respondent No.2 is the legally wedded wife of the revisionist and respondent No.3 is the revisionist's son as also keeping in view that the respondent No.2 is not in a position to feed herself and raise her minor child, the Family Court has passed the order of interim maintenance.
4.On due consideration to the submission advanced, perusal of the record as also the order impugned, I find no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order.
5.The revision, being devoid of merit, is dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.5.2024 kkb/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Family Court's order directing interim maintenance was illegal or infirm?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Singh @ Lucky
State of U.P.
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
