Revisionist failed to provide the mandatory Demand Draft of Rs. 75,000 as a condition for the stay of the impugned order. Consequently, the interim stay order was vacated and the matter was listed for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3627 of 2024
Revisionist :- Pradeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kedar Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 13.12.2024
SFH
Digitally signed by :- SYED FAHIM HUSAIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
