This criminal revision challenged an interim maintenance order and an appellate order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The revisionist failed to comply with the appellate direction to deposit a higher amount. The revision was dismissed for lack of merit.
The revision was dismissed as it lacked merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:165713
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3474 of 2024
Revisionist :- Ajay Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Hari Om Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
may be proceeded in accordance with law under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Salim
Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an interim maintenance order of Rs. 2,000/- passed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 warrants revision despite non-compliance by the applicant.
Whether the High Court should interfere in the matter given the appellate authority had already shown indulgence by directing a higher maintenance amount which remained uncomplied with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Singh
State of U.P.
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
