Revision challenged interim maintenance of Rs.2500 per month to wife and Rs.1500 each to two others plus Rs.10,000 litigation expenses ordered by Family Court, Bareilly. The High Court found the amounts were interim, based on admitted private employment, and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:165538
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3355 of 2024
Revisionist :- Shubham Agarwal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sanjay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Salim
Digitally signed by :- SALIM PRAVEJ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court was excessive given the revisionist's admitted private employment.
State Of U.P.
Opposite Party No.2
Opposite Party No.3
Opposite Party No.4
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
