In Criminal Revision No. 3245 of 2024 regarding POCSO discharge rejection, the High Court directed the court to submit a report on the trial status and fix the case for fresh hearing.
Report directed to be called for; case fixed for fresh hearing on 30.09.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3245 of 2024
Revisionist :- Rahul Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Kuldeep Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
The order dated 14.05.2024 passed by learned District and Session Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Prayagraj whereby discharge application of the revisionist has been rejected, is the subject matter of challenge in the present criminal revision.
Learned A.G.A. pointed out that 27.02.2024 was the date fixed for framing of charges against the revisionist.
Let a report be called for from the concerned Presiding Officer with regard to present status of trial of the applicant.
Put up this case as fresh on 30.09.2024 along with the report.
Order Date :- 6.9.2024 Kashifa
Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
