Sahun v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision where the revisionist was absent on revised call and the office reported the death of opposite party Gangadhar; the court merely listed the matter for a future date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2977 of 2024
Revisionist :- Sahun Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Kartikey Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
Even after revised call, none is there on behalf of the revisionist.
The office has reported that as per the letter received from Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, opposite party No.2 Gangadhar died on 5.10.2024.
List this case on 20.12.2024.
Order Date :- 21.11.2024 Kamarjahan
Digitally signed by :- KAMARJAHAN ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sahun
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Gangadhar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/2977/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court