Juvenile revision under Section 102 JJ Act seeking bail was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel for the revisionist appeared to press the prayer despite revised listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1291 of 2024
Revisionist :- Juvenile X Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Pankaj Tripathi,Sanjay Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State of U.P.
Dhirendra Kumar
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
