This is a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed by a party opposing proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. The High Court rejected the petition as wholly misconceived, holding that the petitioner could not have a grievance regarding an order terminating proceedings initiated by the opposing party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:198788
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22748 of 2024
Petitioner :- Murari Lal Chaudhary Alias Murari Lal Verma Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Srivastava,Pankaj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 12.12.2024 Imtiyaz
Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a party who is not the aggrieved party to an order under Section 145 Cr.P.C. can maintain a writ petition challenging the order.
Whether the petitioner is maintainable to challenge an order terminating proceedings initiated by the opposing party.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Murari Lal Chaudhary Alias Murari Lal Verma
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
Imtiyaz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
