Rahul v. State of Up and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge criminal miscellaneous writ petition. Petitioner argued it became infructuous due to efflux of time. Respondent's counsel had no objection. Court dismissed the petition.
Single-judge criminal miscellaneous writ petition. Petitioner argued it became infructuous due to efflux of time. Respondent's counsel had no objection. Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:196821
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21877 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rahul Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Order Date :- 16.12.2024 YK
Digitally signed by :- YASHWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul
State Of Up
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court