Considering the contention of the petitioner's counsel that there is no offence committed by the petitioner, in fact, the error was on the part of the Revenue Authorities while processing the file for execution of sale deed in respect of the land in question wherein instead of mentioning only the area of 0.01394 hec. which had devolved upon the petitioner after the death of his mother the entire area i.e. 0.083866 hec. which fell in his share was mentioned, though, earlier this very area had been sold of by the petitioner vide sale deed dated 13.01.2021 and that he is ready to co-operate in execution of rectification deed and as also no compensation in respect of excess area has been paid to the petitioner as yet, we provide that the petitioner along with his brother, nephew, bhabhi etc. who are sellers in the sale deed dated 28.02.2024 executed by them in favour of UPEIDA through the Tehsildar Shri Hridayram Tiwari should appear before this Court. So will the Tehsildar Shri Hridayram Tiwari and the opposite party no. 4- informant Kalluram so as to enable this Court to explore the possibility of amicable settlement, as, prima facie, it does appear that the matter can be settled by execution of a rectification deed and with further provision that such compensation shall be paid to the petitioner to which he is entitled in law, therefore, this writ petition shall now come up before the Court on 04.04.2024 as fresh.
