The petitioner's criminal miscellaneous writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by this Court, noting no substantive arguments were required as the petition had lost its utility.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:164295-DB
Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17662 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rahul Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dev Prakash Sharma,Priyanka Devi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 16.10.2024 Suraj Srivastav
Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rahul Sharma
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
