The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR and interim non-coercive action, directing parties to file affidavits before further proceedings.
Interim stay on coercive action against the petitioner under the impugned FIR.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12689 of 2024
Petitioner :- Pankaj Pandey Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madan Lal Srivastava,Ramesh Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Singh Sangwan,J. Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024 DKS
Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTWA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the First Information Report under the IPC charges against the petitioner is sustainable pending the adjudication of a related writ petition challenging the appointment of the accused.
Whether interim relief preventing coercive action against the petitioner is warranted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pankaj Pandey
State Of Up
Neelam Singh
Uttam Anand
Other
Arvind Singh Sangwan
Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
