The court permitted the applicant to remove one opposite party from the array. Notice was issued to the remaining opposite party to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for violation of a previous court order.
Notice issued to show cause against contempt; one opposite party removed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4773 of 2024
Applicant :- Vikas Kumar
Opposite Party :- Ravindra Singh District Inspector Of Schools And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vashishtha Tiwari
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
The counsel for the applicant is permitted to delete opposite party no. 2 from the array of parties during the course of the day as no contempt can be attributed to the Director of Secondary Education, at this stage.
Issue notice to the opposite party no. 1 fixing 23.9.2024 to answer as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against him for violation of the order passed by this Court.
List in the additional cause list on 23.9.2024 .
Order Date :- 25.7.2024 Satyam
Digitally signed by :- SATYAM AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vikas Kumar
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
