The court dismissed the criminal writ petition as infructuous on the basis that the petitioners had already been exonerated from the alleged offences, rendering the petition unnecessary.
Dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:182798-DB
Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10816 of 2024
Petitioner :- Anshika @ Garima Pandey And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adya Prasad Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- Akhil Tripathi,G.A.,Om Prakash Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 22.11.2024 NLY
Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives given the petitioners have been exonerated from the alleged offences?
Anshika @ Garima Pandey And Another
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
