Disposed
Ranveer and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCCRLP/10622/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged the FIR under Sections 306, 504, and 506 IPC. Relying on Sanju vs. State of M.P., the counsel argued ingredients for abetting under Section 107 IPC were missing. The court listed the matter for counter-affidavits and directed no coercive action until the next hearing.
What did the court decide?
Stayed coercive action against petitioners until the next date of listing after filing counter-affidavits by respondents.