The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner and his counsel did not appear to press the matter, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the pending case.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79750
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1002188 of 2013
Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar @ Sita Ram Respondent :- Session Judge Unnao And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Ashok Kr. Verma
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
Order Date :- 2.12.2024 Arun/-
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shailendra Kumar
Session Judge Unnao
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
