The High Court at Allahabad dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, invoking judicial maxims on vigilance and ending litigation.
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:79837
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1005438 of 2013
Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Objection Filed Respondent :- Additional Session Judge/Special Judge4 S.C./S.T. Act And Ors
Counsel for Petitioner :- Manjusha Kapil,Deshraj Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Himanshu K. Srivastava
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
Order Date :- 2.12.2024
Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Dileep Kumar
Additional Session Judge/Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act And Ors
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
