Petitioner failed to appear. Court applied maxims of vigilance and ending litigation to dismiss the writ petition pending since 2013 for non-prosecution.
The pending writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:80218
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1001704 of 2013
Petitioner :- Javwad Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.N.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Kamla Kant Singh
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
(i) Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt (The law assists only those who are vigilant, and not those who sleep over their rights); and
(ii) Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium (In the interest of the society as a whole, the litigation must come to an end).
The above said two maxims are sister provisions, which would highlight and spotlight that the party seeking remedy before the Court should be vigilant, otherwise, the law would not come to their help and there should be end to litigation.
Order Date :- 3.12.2024 Jyoti/-
Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Javwad
The State Of U.P.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
