Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court Court No. 11 dismissed the appellant's application under Section 5 limitations of C.R.P. Code by failing to exercise any discretion but merely issuing notice to the opposite party no.2.
What the court decided
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 149 of 2024 Appellant :- Pramod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another
Counsel for Appellant :- Subodh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(Order on condonation of delay)
Issue notice to the opposite party no.2, returnable at an early date.
Learned counsel for the appellant shall take requisite steps for service of notice in this regard within a period of three days.
List this case in the week commencing 15.07.2024.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)
Order Date :- 6.6.2024 Preeti.
Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pramod Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Subhash Vidyarthi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLAD/149/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Praveen Kumar Giri
- Order 2 · Praveen Kumar Giri
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mithilesh Kumar Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Phooman Singh vs Union of India Thru. Revenue Intelligence Office, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Another
Guddu @ Riyaz Ahmad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow and 3 Others
Harshit Tiwari @ Aman Tiwari vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others