Learned counsel for the appellant has argued that initially on the basis of the allegations made by the complainant, an FIR dated 28.08.2016 bearing Case Crime No. 979 of2016, under Sections 420, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(X) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 was registered, wherein after completion of thorough investigation, a final report dated 10.01.2017 under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. was filed and the appellant was exonerated. Learned counsel submits that aggrieved against the said conclusion by the investigating officer, the complainant preferred a protest petition, which was treated as a complaint case, wherein after recording presummoning evidence, the process against the accused-appellant was issued on 16.11.2017. Learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the said summoning order dated 16.11.2017 was challenged before this Court through application bearing no. 2214 of 2018 and while refusing to interfere with the summoning order dated 16.11.2017, liberty was granted to the appellant to move a discharge application. Learned counsel submits that pursuant to the said liberty, the appellant preferred a discharge application and the same has been partly accepted order dated 08.04.2023. Learned counsel has pointed out that in this background, it is a fit case for grant of concession of pre-arrest bail to the appellant, but ignoring
