Shrichand Chaurasiya v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was adjourned sine die due to a strike called by lawyers. No decision was rendered by the court below or this court in this order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3628 of 2024
Appellant :- Shrichand Chaurasiya Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Alauddin,Fakhruddin Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Bajaj,J.
Upon a call given by High Court Bar Association, Allahabad, lawyers are abstaining from work.
No one has appeared on behalf of appellant. Learned A.G.A. is present.
In the interest of justice, the case is adjourned to 25.7.2024, as fresh.
Order Date :- 11.7.2024 P.S.Parihar
Digitally signed by :- POORAN SINGH PARIHAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shrichand Chaurasiya
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Manoj Bajaj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/3628/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court