Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava, J., enlarged appellant Lokesh on bail during appeal pendency. He misread evidence, FIR delayed by six months, no misuse of bail, good history. Still not issues merits. Furnish personal bond and two sureties. Each like amount.
Appellant enlarged on bail pending appeal by furnishing personal bond and two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:116553
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 461 of 2024
Appellant :- Lokesh Respondent :- State Of Up Others Counsel for Appellant :- Punya Sheel Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order on Criminal Misc. (Suspension of Sentence) Bail Application No. 01 of 2024
prayer as made in the application but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
Order on Memo of Appeal
Order Date :- 22.7.2024 Karan
Digitally signed by :- KUMAR KARAN RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to bail during the pendency of the appeal given the delay in filing the FIR and lack of criminal record.
Lokesh
State Of Up
Saurabh Srivastava
Kumar Karan Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
