Mohar Singh v. State of Up and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This order is purely administrative. The court took a rejoinder affidavit on record, corrected the cause list to include a previously omitted advocate for a respondent, and listed the matter for future hearing. No substantive legal issue was decided.
What the court decided
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 406 of 2024
Appellant :- Mohar Singh Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Santosh Kumar Singh,Vikash Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
- Rejoinder affidavit preferred on behalf of the appellant is taken on record.
- Vakalatnama has already been preferred by Sri Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.3, but his name is not reflected in the cause list.
- Office is hereby directed to show the name of Sri Pradeep Kumar Bhardwaj as counsel for the opposite party no.3 in future list.
- Put up this case as fresh on 25.09.2024 .
Order Date :- 3.9.2024 Saif
Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohar Singh
- respondent
State Of Up And 2 Others
Coram
Saurabh Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/406/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Nand Prabha Shukla
- Order 2 · Nand Prabha Shukla
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court