Appellant convicted and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment sought bail pending appeal, citing nine months served custody, no prior criminal history, and contradictory victim statement and FIR. Court granted bail on personal bond and two sureties during pendency of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3194 of 2024
Appellant :- Ranjeet Bind Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Suneel Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order on Application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
matter of final adjudication of this appeal.
Order on Appeal
Order Date :- 4.10.2024 Vikram
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant convicted under Section 354 IPC and Sections 9m/10 POCSO Act should be granted bail during pendency of appeal after over nine months in custody?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ranjeet Bind
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
