Satyaram Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3161 of 2024
Appellant :- Satyaram Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
Heard Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Anurag Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
Notice on behalf of respondent no.1 has been accepted by the office of learned A.G.A.
Admit.
Summon the trial Court record.
Issue notice to the opposite party no.2, returnable at an early date.
Steps be taken within a week.
Let objection to the bail application moved on behalf of the appellant be filed within two weeks.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Satyaram Yadav
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/3161/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
- Order 2 · Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court