Disposed

Jai Singh Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Aug 2024CRLA/3048/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellants stated they were not pressing the appeal against the cognizance order and charge sheet. The court disposed of the appeal with a direction for expeditious consideration of bail applications if the appellants surrender and apply for bail, while restraining coercive action for 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of; no coercive action for 30 days; direction for expeditious bail consideration upon surrender.

Jai Singh Yadav and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:152641

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3048 of 2024

¶4

Appellant :- Jai Singh Yadav And 3 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Appellant :- Anil Kumar Sharma,Kapil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Satyendra Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for parties.

¶7

This criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'SC/ST Act') has been filed with a prayer to set aside the order of cognizance dated 20.01.2024 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Jalaun at Orai and charge sheet dated 17.11.2023 under sections 323, 504 IPC and under Section 3(1)(da), 3(1)(dh) of SC/ST Act in S.T. no. 9/2024 (State vs. Jai Singh Yadav and others), Case Crime no. 324/2023, Police Station Kalpi, District Jalaun.

¶8

Learned counsel for appellants submitted that he is not pressing the appeal on merits and confined his prayer only to the extent that the present appeal may be disposed of finally with a direction to the court concerned that in case appellants surrender before it and apply for bail, their bail application may be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825) to which learned counsel for opposite parties have no objection.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, the instant criminal appeal is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the appellants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 30 days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with settled law.

¶10

However, it is made clear that till 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellants herein.

¶11

Order Date :- 18.9.2024

¶12

Shaswat

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jai Singh Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Singh Yadav and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Jitendra Yadav vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Yashwant Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Rashmi and Another vs State of Up and 5 Others

Kamlesh Kumar Patel vs State of U.P. and Another

Vinod Kumar Verma and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Faiz and Another vs State of Up and 4 Others