Kalloo @ Rakesh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment disposes of Criminal Appeal No. 2917 of 2007 arising from Court No. 16. Relying on the Chief Judicial Magistrate's report dated 30.07.2024, the court held that the sole appellant, Kalloo @ Rakesh, had expired during the appeal's pendency and thus the appeal stands abated.
What did the court decide?
Abatement of Criminal Appeal No. 2917 of 2007.; Return of trial court record to the concerned court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:53782
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2917 of 2007
Appellant :- Kalloo @ Rakesh Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- M.L. Syal,Shashi Kiran Arya Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
As per report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardoi dated 30.07.2024, the sole appellant, Kalloo @ Rakesh had already been expired during pendency of the appeal.
In view of the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardoi dated 30.07.2024, the instant appeal stands abated.
Trial court record, if any, be sent back to the court concerned.
Consign to record.
Order Date :- 6.8.2024 Saurabh
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal should be allowed or disposed of given the death of the appellant during the pendency of the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kalloo @ Rakesh
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Saurabh Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/2917/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court