Jagdish v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal No. 1794 of 2004 in which the sole appellant, Jagdish, expired during its pendency. The High Court held that the appeal has abated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:53430
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1794 of 2004
Appellant :- Jagdish Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Rishad Murtaza Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
As per the report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur dated31.07.2024 the sole appellant-Jagdish had already expired during the pendency of the appeal.
The appeal on behalf of sole appellant-Jagdish stands abated.
Let the record of trial court, if any, be returned back to the court concerned.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 5.8.2024 Arvind
Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Coram
Shamim Ahmed
Arvind Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1794/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court